1
Associate Professor of Faculty of Law, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, responsible author,
2
Master's student in oil and gas law, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran
Abstract
Abstract of the epistemological concerns governing the scientific atmosphere of the country regarding the real link between the field and the university, as Imam Par said, the culture of universities and non-field centers is more accustomed to experience and touch of reality than philosophical and theoretical culture; By removing the distance, the school and the university should merge into each other so that the field for the expansion of Islamic knowledge becomes wider (Imam Khomeini, Bita, 243). It is the basic and necessary origin of the comparative study of humanities. It is clear that comparative study depends on adopting the right method among the research methods. Comparative studies in the field of humanities and interdisciplinary studies have different methods: firstly, the conventional lessons of each field are presented without fundamental changes and Beside that, a few educational lessons should be considered as seasoning that this approach has not and will not lead to the right place. Another method is the eclectic method, which is definitely invalid, and finally, this is the only "integrated" approach that can be useful with a solid and accepted methodology.
Yasrebi, A. M., & Razegheian, S. (2018). Different patterns of methodology in interdisciplinary humanities studies. نشریه علمی و تخصصی فرصت, 2018401(4), 1-32.
MLA
Ali mohammad Yasrebi; Sina Razegheian. "Different patterns of methodology in interdisciplinary humanities studies", نشریه علمی و تخصصی فرصت, 2018401, 4, 2018, 1-32.
HARVARD
Yasrebi, A. M., Razegheian, S. (2018). 'Different patterns of methodology in interdisciplinary humanities studies', نشریه علمی و تخصصی فرصت, 2018401(4), pp. 1-32.
VANCOUVER
Yasrebi, A. M., Razegheian, S. Different patterns of methodology in interdisciplinary humanities studies. نشریه علمی و تخصصی فرصت, 2018; 2018401(4): 1-32.
)